RegrowProtocol

Figures

Oral or topical minoxidil: an interval that crosses zero

The meta-analysis mean difference in hair density between oral and topical minoxidil, drawn with its 95% confidence interval. The interval straddles zero, so no difference was detected, and it is wide enough that a modest one could not have been either. Compare the dutasteride plate, where the whole interval sits above zero. What separates these two is route, availability and side effects, in the panel below.

Free to use anywhere, including commercially, with a visible link back to this page. Licensing without the credit line.

Oral or topical minoxidil: an interval that crosses zero. The meta-analysis mean difference in hair density between oral and topical minoxidil, drawn with its 95% confidence interval.
Use this figure on your own site

Free to use anywhere, including commercially, if you keep a visible link back to this page. The file carries a small credit line under the drawing so the attribution survives being saved and re-uploaded; leave it there, or licence it away. It is drawn from the sources cited beneath it and follows your reader's light or dark theme.

Open the SVG directly · PNG, 1200px wide · All figures

Every number printed on this figure, and where it came from

Each quantity the diagram prints, the sentence it was taken from, and the guide that sentence is in. The build refuses to publish if one of these sentences is no longer in the guide it names.

ValueWhat it is, and the sentence behind itSource guide
0.95 hairsThe mean difference in hair density between oral and topical
“in hair density improvement (mean difference 0.95, 95% CI −24.98 to 26.87)”
Oral Minoxidil for Hair Loss: Evidence-Based Review
−24.98 hairsThe lower bound of the 95% confidence interval, below zero
“in hair density improvement (mean difference 0.95, 95% CI −24.98 to 26.87)”
Oral Minoxidil for Hair Loss: Evidence-Based Review
26.87 hairsThe upper bound of the 95% confidence interval
“in hair density improvement (mean difference 0.95, 95% CI −24.98 to 26.87)”
Oral Minoxidil for Hair Loss: Evidence-Based Review
35-47%The reported range of patients seeing meaningful improvement on oral minoxidil
“about 35-47% of patients experiencing meaningful improvement”
Oral Minoxidil for Hair Loss: Evidence-Based Review
15.1%Hypertrichosis in the largest published series
“15.1% of patients in the largest published series”
Oral Minoxidil for Hair Loss: Evidence-Based Review
93%Hypertrichosis at the 5 mg dose
“Higher doses (5 mg) cause hypertrichosis in up to 93% of patients”
Oral Minoxidil for Hair Loss: Evidence-Based Review
16-22%Patients reporting transient early shedding
“Between 16-22% of patients experience transient shedding”
Oral Minoxidil for Hair Loss: Evidence-Based Review

Where this figure appears

Oral Minoxidil for Hair Loss: Evidence-Based Review

Other figures

When this guide changes, hear about it

Hair-loss advice ages badly. A trial lands, a dose recommendation shifts, or a figure we published turns out to be wrong — and this page changes. Leave an address and you get told when that happens to a guide you read.

Double opt-in: you confirm from your own inbox, so nobody can add you to this. No scheduled newsletter, no tracking pixel, one-click unsubscribe. What we store.